|
Literatur:
Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L (1996) Automaticity of social behavior:
direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology 71: 230–244.
Bargh J (2006) What have we been priming all these years? On the
development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European
Journal of Social Psychology 36: 147–168.
Cesario J, Plaks JE, Higgins ET (2006) Automatic social behavior as
motivated preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90:
893.
Harris, C. R., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., &
Pashler, H. (2013). Two Failures to Replicate HighPerformance-Goal Priming
Effects. (J. de Fockert, Ed.)PLoS ONE, 8(8), e72467. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0072467.g001
Hepler, J., & Albarracin, D. (2013). Complete unconscious
control: Using (in)action primes to demonstrate completely unconscious
activation of inhibitory control mechanisms. Cognition, 128(3), 271–279.
doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.012
Klein, O., Doyen, S., Magalhaes de Saldanha da Gama, P., Miller,
S., Questienne, L., Leys, C., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Low Hopes, High
Expectations Expectancy Effects and the Replicability of Behavioral
Experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 572–584.
doi:10.1177/1745691612463704
Pashler, H., Coburn, N., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Priming of
Social Distance? Failure to Replicate Effects on Social and Food Judgments.
(J. Lauwereyns, Ed.)PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42510.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042510.t002
Papies, E. K., & Hamstra, P. (2010). Goal priming and eating
behavior: Enhancing self-regulation by environmental cues. Health Psychology,
29, 384-388.
Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer
consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations.
Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 263–276
Simons, D. J. (2014). The Value of Direct Replication. Perspectives
on Psychological Science, 9(1), 76–80. doi:10.1177/1745691613514755
Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014). The Alleged Crisis and the
Illusion of Exact Replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1),
59–71. doi:10.1177/1745691613514450
|
|